International circumpolar surveillance: update on the interlaboratory quality control program for Streptococcus pneumoniae, 2009 to 2020.

The International Circumpolar Surveillance (ICS) program is a population-based surveillance network for invasive bacterial diseases throughout Arctic countries and territories. The ICS quality control program for Streptococcus pneumoniae serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing has been ongoing since 1999. Current participating laboratories include the Provincial Laboratory for Public Health in Edmonton, Alberta; Laboratoire de santé publique du Québec in Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec; the Centers for Disease Control's Arctic Investigations Program in Anchorage, Alaska; the Neisseria and Streptococcus Reference Laboratory at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen, Denmark; the Department of Clinical Microbiology, Landspitali in Reykjavik, Iceland; and Public Health Agency of Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, Manitoba. From 2009 to 2020, 140 isolates of S. pneumoniae were distributed among the six laboratories as part of the quality control program. Overall serotype concordance was 96.9%, with 99.3% concordance to pool level. All participating laboratories had individual concordance rates >92% for serotype and >97% for pool. Overall concordance by modal minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for testing done by broth microdilution or Etest was 99.1%, and >98% for all antimicrobials tested. Categorical concordance was >98% by both CLSI and EUCAST criteria. For two laboratories performing disc diffusion, rates of concordance by modal MIC were >97% for most antimicrobials, except chloramphenicol (>93%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (>88%). Data collected from 12 years of the ICS quality control program for S. pneumoniae demonstrate excellent (≥95%) overall concordance for serotype and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results across six laboratories. IMPORTANCE: Arctic populations experience several social and physical challenges that lead to the increased spread and incidence of invasive diseases. The International Circumpolar Surveillance (ICS) program was developed to monitor five invasive bacterial diseases in Arctic countries and territories. Each ICS organism has a corresponding interlaboratory quality control (QC) program for laboratory-based typing, to ensure the technical precision and accuracy of reference testing services for these regions, and identify and correct potential problems. Here, we describe the results of the ICS Streptococcus pneumoniae QC program, from 2009 to 2020. Excellent overall concordance was achieved for serotype and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results across six laboratories. Ongoing participation in these QC programs ensures the continuation of quality surveillance systems within Arctic populations that experience health disparities.

Clonal diversity of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 19A collected from children < 5 years old in Québec, Canada, 2016-2021.

Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 19A is a highly diverse, often antimicrobial-resistant Gram-positive bacterium which can cause invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). In 2021, public health authorities in the Canadian province of Québec observed an increase of serotype 19A IPD in children <5 years. The purpose of this study was to determine the clonal composition of serotype 19A isolates collected from this age group in Québec, from 2016 to 2021. Forty-one and 37 IPD isolates from children <5 years from Québec and the remainder of Canada, respectively, were sequenced using the Illumina NextSeq platform. Phylogenetic analysis using SNVPhyl identified three clusters, corresponding to three common clones of serotype 19A: CC199, CC320 and ST695. CC199, predominantly represented by ST416, accounted for similar proportions of serotype 19A isolates collected from children in Québec (19.5 %) and other Canadian jurisdictions (OCJs, 21.6 %), with significant presence of ermB (62.5 % and 60 % of ST416 isolates, respectively). CC320 was more commonly identified from OCJs in comparison to Québec (18.9 % vs. 7.3 %, respectively), but were highly antimicrobial-resistant regardless of region. ST695 was the most common clone of serotype 19A collected in Québec from children <5 years, representing 65.9 % of isolates collected over the study period (40.5 % of isolates collected in OCJs). Phylogenetic analysis identified geographical differences in ST695 across Canada; including a large clade specific to Québec (with both susceptible and macrolide-resistant [ermB] subclades), and a separate macrolide-resistant (mefA) clade associated with OCJs. The Québec-specific ermB-ST695 clone represented 48.1 % of ST695 collected from the province. Continued genomic surveillance of S. pneumoniae serotype 19A is required to: i) track the prevalence and clonal composition of serotype 19A in Québec in future years; ii) characterize the clonal distribution of serotype 19A in adult populations; and iii) monitor whether the currently geographically restricted ermB-ST695 clone observed in Québec expands to OCJs.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of invasive isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Canadian patients: the SAVE study, 2011-2020.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the antimicrobial susceptibility of 14 138 invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected in Canada from 2011 to 2020. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI M07 broth microdilution reference method. MICs were interpreted using 2022 CLSI M100 breakpoints. RESULTS: In 2020, 90.1% and 98.6% of invasive pneumococci were penicillin-susceptible when MICs were interpreted using CLSI meningitis or oral and non-meningitis breakpoints, respectively; 96.9% (meningitis breakpoint) and 99.5% (non-meningitis breakpoint) of isolates were ceftriaxone-susceptible, and 99.9% were levofloxacin-susceptible. Numerically small, non-temporal, but statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in the annual percentage of isolates susceptible to four of the 13 agents tested was observed across the 10-year study: chloramphenicol (4.4% difference), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (3.9%), penicillin (non-meningitis breakpoint, 2.7%) and ceftriaxone (meningitis breakpoint, 2.7%; non-meningitis breakpoint, 1.2%). During the same period, annual differences in percent susceptible values for penicillin (meningitis and oral breakpoints) and all other agents did not achieve statistical significance. The percentage of isolates with an MDR phenotype (resistance to ≥3 antimicrobial classes) in 2011 and 2020 (8.5% and 9.4%) was not significantly different (P = 0.109), although there was a significant interim decrease observed between 2011 and 2015 (P < 0.001) followed by a significant increase between 2016 and 2020 (P < 0.001). Statistically significant associations were observed between resistance rates to most antimicrobial agents included in the MDR analysis (penicillin, clarithromycin, clindamycin, doxycycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and chloramphenicol) and patient age, specimen source, geographic location in Canada or concurrent resistance to penicillin or clarithromycin, but not biological sex of patients. Given the large isolate collection studied, statistical significance did not necessarily imply clinical or public health significance in some analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive pneumococcal isolates collected in Canada from 2011 to 2020 generally exhibited consistent in vitro susceptibility to commonly tested antimicrobial agents.

Analysis of MDR in the predominant Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes in Canada: the SAVE study, 2011-2020.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the levels of MDR in the predominant serotypes of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated in Canada over a 10 year period. METHODS: All isolates were serotyped and had antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed, in accordance with CLSI guidelines (M07-11 Ed., 2018). Complete susceptibility profiles were available for 13 712 isolates. MDR was defined as resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents (penicillin MIC ≥2 mg/L defined as resistant). Serotypes were determined by Quellung reaction. RESULTS: In total, 14 138 invasive isolates of S. pneumoniae were tested in the SAVE study (S. pneumoniae Serotyping and Antimicrobial Susceptibility: Assessment for Vaccine Efficacy in Canada), a collaboration between the Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance and Public Health Agency of Canada-National Microbiology Laboratory. The rate of MDR S. pneumoniae in SAVE was 6.6% (902/13 712). Annual rates of MDR S. pneumoniae decreased between 2011 and 2015 (8.5% to 5.7%) and increased between 2016 and 2020 (3.9% to 9.4%). Serotypes 19A and 15A were the most common serotypes demonstrating MDR (25.4% and 23.5% of the MDR isolates, respectively); however, the serotype diversity index increased from 0.7 in 2011 to 0.9 in 2020 with a statistically significant linear increasing trend (P < 0.001). In 2020, MDR isolates were frequently serotypes 4 and 12F in addition to serotypes 15A and 19A. In 2020, 27.3%, 45.5%, 50.5%, 65.7% and 68.7% of invasive MDR S. pneumoniae were serotypes included in the PCV10, PCV13, PCV15, PCV20 and PPSV23 vaccines, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although current vaccine coverage of MDR S. pneumoniae in Canada is high, the increasing diversity of serotypes observed among the MDR isolates highlights the ability of S. pneumoniae to rapidly evolve.

Genomic investigation of the most common Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes causing invasive infections in Canada: the SAVE study, 2011-2020.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the lineages and genomic antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants of the 10 most common pneumococcal serotypes identified in Canada during the five most recent years of the SAVE study, in the context of the 10-year post-PCV13 period in Canada. METHODS: The 10 most common invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes collected by the SAVE study from 2016 to 2020 were 3, 22F, 9N, 8, 4, 12F, 19A, 33F, 23A and 15A. A random sample comprising ∼5% of each of these serotypes collected during each year of the full SAVE study (2011-2020) were selected for whole-genome sequencing (WGS) using the Illumina NextSeq platform. Phylogenomic analysis was performed using the SNVPhyl pipeline. WGS data were used to identify virulence genes of interest, sequence types, global pneumococcal sequence clusters (GPSC) and AMR determinants. RESULTS: Of the 10 serotypes analysed in this study, six increased significantly in prevalence from 2011 to 2020: 3, 4, 8, 9N, 23A and 33F (P ≤ 0.0201). Serotypes 12F and 15A remained stable in prevalence over time, while serotype 19A decreased in prevalence (P < 0.0001). The investigated serotypes represented four of the most prevalent international lineages causing non-vaccine serotype pneumococcal disease in the PCV13 era: GPSC3 (serotypes 8/33F), GPSC19 (22F), GPSC5 (23A) and GPSC26 (12F). Of these lineages, GPSC5 isolates were found to consistently possess the most AMR determinants. Commonly collected vaccine serotypes 3 and 4 were associated with GPSC12 and GPSC27, respectively. However, a more recently collected lineage of serotype 4 (GPSC192) was highly clonal and possessed AMR determinants. CONCLUSIONS: Continued genomic surveillance of S. pneumoniae in Canada is essential to monitor for the appearance of new and evolving lineages, including antimicrobial-resistant GPSC5 and GPSC162.

Comparison of PCV10, PCV13, PCV15, PCV20 and PPSV23 vaccine coverage of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolate serotypes in Canada: the SAVE study, 2011-20.

BACKGROUND: As pneumococci evolve under vaccine, antimicrobial and other selective pressures, it is important to track isolates covered by established (PCV10, PCV13 and PPSV23) and new (PCV15 and PCV20) vaccine formulations. OBJECTIVES: To compare invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) isolates from serotypes covered by PCV10, PCV13, PCV15, PCV20 and PPSV23, collected in Canada from 2011 to 2020, by demographic category and antimicrobial resistance phenotype. METHODS: IPD isolates from the SAVE study were initially collected by members of the Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network (CPHLN) as part of a collaboration between the Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance (CARA) and the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). Serotypes were determined by quellung reaction, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI broth microdilution method. RESULTS: A total of 14 138 invasive isolates were collected from 2011 to 2020, with 30.7% of isolates covered by the PCV13 vaccine, 43.6% of isolates covered by the PCV15 vaccine (including 12.9% non-PCV13 serotypes 22F and 33F), and 62.6% of isolates covered by the PCV20 vaccine (including 19.0% non-PCV15 serotypes 8, 10A, 11A, 12F and 15B/C). Non-PCV20 serotypes 2, 9N, 17F and 20, but not 6A (present in PPSV23) represented 8.8% of all IPD isolates. Higher-valency vaccine formulations covered significantly more isolates by age, sex, region and resistance phenotype including MDR isolates. Coverage of XDR isolates did not significantly differ between vaccine formulations. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with PCV13 and PCV15, PCV20 covered significantly more IPD isolates stratified by patient age, region, sex, individual antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and MDR phenotype.

Sulopenem: An Intravenous and Oral Penem for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections Due to Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.

Sulopenem (formerly known as CP-70,429, and CP-65,207 when a component of a racemic mixture with its R isomer) is an intravenous and oral penem that possesses in vitro activity against fluoroquinolone-resistant, extended spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL)-producing, multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales. Sulopenem is being developed to treat patients with uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) as well as intra-abdominal infections. This review will focus mainly on its use in UTIs. The chemical structure of sulopenem shares properties of penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. Sulopenem is available as an oral prodrug formulation, sulopenem etzadroxil, which is hydrolyzed by intestinal esterases, resulting in active sulopenem. In early studies, the S isomer of CP-65,207, later developed as sulopenem, demonstrated greater absorption, higher drug concentrations in the urine, and increased stability against the renal enzyme dehydropeptidase-1 compared with the R isomer, which set the stage for its further development as a UTI antimicrobial. Sulopenem is active against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms. Sulopenem's ß-lactam ring alkylates the serine residues of penicillin-binding protein (PBP), which inhibits peptidoglycan cross-linking. Due to its ionization and low molecular weight, sulopenem passes through outer membrane proteins to reach PBPs of Gram-negative bacteria. While sulopenem activity is unaffected by many ß-lactamases, resistance arises from alterations in PBPs (e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]), expression of carbapenemases (e.g., carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia), reduction in the expression of outer membrane proteins (e.g., some Klebsiella spp.), and the presence of efflux pumps (e.g., MexAB-OprM in Pseudomonas aeruginosa), or a combination of these mechanisms. In vitro studies have reported that sulopenem demonstrates greater activity than meropenem and ertapenem against Enterococcus faecalis, Listeria monocytogenes, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and Staphylococcus epidermidis, as well as similar activity to carbapenems against Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes. With some exceptions, sulopenem activity against Gram-negative aerobes was less than ertapenem and meropenem but greater than imipenem. Sulopenem activity against Escherichia coli carrying ESBL, CTX-M, or Amp-C enzymes, or demonstrating MDR phenotypes, as well as against ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, was nearly identical to ertapenem and meropenem and greater than imipenem. Sulopenem exhibited identical or slightly greater activity than imipenem against many Gram-positive and Gram-negative anaerobes, including Bacteroides fragilis. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous sulopenem appear similar to carbapenems such as imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and doripenem. In healthy subjects, reported volumes of distribution (Vd) ranged from 15.8 to 27.6 L, total drug clearances (CLT) of 18.9-24.9 L/h, protein binding of approximately 10%, and elimination half-lives (t½) of 0.88-1.03 h. The estimated renal clearance (CLR) of sulopenem is 8.0-10.6 L/h, with 35.5% ± 6.7% of a 1000 mg dose recovered unchanged in the urine. An ester prodrug, sulopenem etzadroxil, has been developed for oral administration. Initial investigations reported a variable oral bioavailability of 20-34% under fasted conditions, however subsequent work showed that bioavailability is significantly improved by administering sulopenem with food to increase its oral absorption or with probenecid to reduce its renal tubular secretion. Food consumption increases the area under the curve (AUC) of oral sulopenem (500 mg twice daily) by 23.6% when administered alone and 62% when administered with 500 mg of probenecid. Like carbapenems, sulopenem demonstrates bactericidal activity that is associated with the percentage of time that free concentrations exceed the MIC (%f T > MIC). In animal models, bacteriostasis was associated with %f T > MICs ranging from 8.6 to 17%, whereas 2-log10 kill was seen at values ranging from 12 to 28%. No pharmacodynamic targets have been documented for suppression of resistance. Sulopenem concentrations in urine are variable, ranging from 21.8 to 420.0 mg/L (median 84.4 mg/L) in fasted subjects and 28.8 to 609.0 mg/L (median 87.3 mg/L) in those who were fed. Sulopenem has been compared with carbapenems and cephalosporins in guinea pig and murine systemic and lung infection animal models. Studied pathogens included Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, B. fragilis, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris, and Serratia marcescens. These studies reported that overall, sulopenem was non-inferior to carbapenems but appeared to be superior to cephalosporins. A phase III clinical trial (SURE-1) reported that sulopenem was not non-inferior to ciprofloxacin in women infected with fluoroquinolone-susceptible pathogens, due to a higher rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in sulopenem-treated patients at the test-of-cure visit. However, the researchers reported superiority of sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid over ciprofloxacin for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs in women infected with fluoroquinolone/non-susceptible pathogens, and non-inferiority in all patients with a positive urine culture. A phase III clinical trial (SURE-2) compared intravenous sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid with ertapenem in the treatment of complicated UTIs. No difference in overall success was noted at the end of therapy. However, intravenous sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem etzadroxil was not non-inferior to ertapenem followed by oral stepdown therapy in overall success at test-of-cure due to a higher rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the sulopenem arm. After a meeting with the US FDA, Iterum stated that they are currently evaluating the optimal design for an additional phase III uncomplicated UTI study to be conducted prior to the potential resubmission of the New Drug Application (NDA). It is unclear at this time whether Iterum intends to apply for EMA or Japanese regulatory approval. The safety and tolerability of sulopenem has been reported in various phase I pharmacokinetic studies and phase III clinical trials. Sulopenem (intravenous and oral) appears to be well tolerated in healthy subjects, with and without the coadministration of probenecid, with few serious drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported to date. Reported TEAEs affecting ≥1% of patients were (from most to least common) diarrhea, nausea, headache, vomiting and dizziness. Discontinuation rates were low and were not different than comparator agents. Sulopenem administered orally and/or intravenously represents a potentially well tolerated and effective option for treating uncomplicated and complicated UTIs, especially in patients with documented or highly suspected antimicrobial pathogens to commonly used agents (e.g. fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli), and in patients with documented microbiological or clinical failure or patients who demonstrate intolerance/adverse effects to first-line agents. This agent will likely be used orally in the outpatient setting, and intravenously followed by oral stepdown in the hospital setting. Sulopenem also allows for oral stepdown therapy in the hospital setting from intravenous non-sulopenem therapy. More clinical data are required to fully assess the clinical efficacy and safety of sulopenem, especially in patients with complicated UTIs caused by resistant pathogens such as ESBL-producing, Amp-C, MDR E. coli. Antimicrobial stewardship programs will need to create guidelines for when this oral and intravenous penem should be used.

Activity of cefepime/taniborbactam and comparators against whole genome sequenced ertapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacterales clinical isolates: CANWARD 2007-19.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed in vitro activities of cefepime/taniborbactam and comparator antimicrobial agents against ertapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacterales (ENSE) clinical isolates collected from the CANWARD study 2007-19, and associations between MIC and various mechanisms of ß-lactam resistance identified using WGS. METHODS: A total of 179 ENSE (MIC ≥ 1 mg/L) isolates underwent susceptibility testing using reference CLSI broth microdilution. WGS was performed using the Illumina NextSeq platform. Carbapenemases, ESBLs and other ß-lactamases were identified using ResFinder 4.0. Alterations in ompC/F and ftsI (PBP3) were identified by comparing extracted sequences to the appropriate NCBI reference gene. Porin alterations were analysed with Provean v1.1.3. Specific alterations of interest in PBP3 included a YRIN or YRIK insertion after P333. RESULTS: Cefepime/taniborbactam was highly active (MIC50/MIC90, 0.5/2 mg/L; 177/179 isolates inhibited at ≤ 8 mg/L) against ENSE with various antimicrobial resistance phenotypes. Thirteen (7.3%) of the 179 ENSE isolates demonstrated cefepime/taniborbactam MIC values ≥ 4 mg/L and possessed combinations of ß-lactam resistance mechanisms, including a carbapenemase and/or ESBL and/or other ß-lactamase genes, as well as alterations in OmpC and/or OmpF and/or PBP3. Of the two Escherichia coli isolates that demonstrated a cefepime/taniborbactam MIC of 32 mg/L, one possessed NDM-5, OXA-181 and TEM-1B, an OmpC alteration and P333_Y334insYRIN in PBP3, while the second contained CTX-M-71, a truncated OmpF and a large alteration in OmpC (F182_R195delinsMTTNGRDDVFE). CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime/taniborbactam was highly active against ENSE with various antimicrobial resistance phenotypes/genotypes. ENSE isolates with cefepime/taniborbactam MIC values ≥ 4 mg/L possessed combinations of ß-lactam resistance mechanisms, including ß-lactamase genes, as well as alterations in OmpC and/or OmpF and/or PBP3.

PCV-15 and PPSV-23 coverage of invasive and respiratory tract Streptococcus pneumoniae, including MDR and XDR isolates: CANWARD 2007-20.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the proportion of invasive and respiratory tract isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, including MDR and XDR strains, that demonstrated PCV-15 and PPSV-23 serotypes in Canada from 2007 to 2020. METHODS: The CANWARD study collected 2984 S. pneumoniae isolates from 2007 to 2020 (1054 invasive, 1930 respiratory). Serotyping was performed using the Quellung reaction. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI methods. MDR/XDR was defined as resistance to ≥3/≥5 antimicrobial classes, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, the proportion of vaccine serotypes demonstrating a PCV-15/PPSV-23 serotype was significantly higher in blood isolates (54.6%/76.2%, respectively) than respiratory isolates (38.9%/55.3%; P < 0.0001). Similarly, PCV-15 and PPSV-23 vaccine coverage was higher for blood isolates for all demographic categories, including both genders, all regions and all age groups (P ≤ 0.0213). PCV-15/PPSV-23 coverage was also significantly higher for blood isolates demonstrating clarithromycin resistance (60.4/75.1% blood, 47.8/57.4% respiratory; P ≤ 0.009) and penicillin resistance (68.9/63.0% blood, 45.2/43.0% respiratory; P < 0.0001) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant isolates for PPSV-23 only (82.6% blood, 64.3% respiratory; P = 0.0057). Vaccine coverage was numerically higher but not significantly different between specimen source for children <2 years of age, as well as ceftriaxone-, doxycycline- and levofloxacin-resistant isolates. PCV-15/PPSV-23 vaccine coverage for MDR isolates (61.8%/67.3% blood, 52.2%/56.2% respiratory) and XDR isolates (93.3% blood, 89.6% respiratory for both vaccines) was not significantly different between specimen sources. CONCLUSIONS: PCV-15 and PPSV-23 serotype coverage is generally greater for blood versus respiratory isolates but not for MDR and XDR isolates. Continued pneumococcal surveillance is warranted to determine future trends in vaccine coverage, serotype distribution and antimicrobial susceptibilities under the pressure of vaccine use.

Use of Fosfomycin Etest To Determine In Vitro Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales Other than Escherichia coli, Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli, and Gram-Positive Cocci.

Clinical isolates of Enterobacterales other than Escherichia coli (EOTEC), nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli, and Gram-positive cocci were tested for susceptibility to fosfomycin using Etest and reference agar dilution. Applying EUCAST (v. 11.0, 2021) intravenous fosfomycin breakpoints, Etest MICs for EOTEC showed essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very major error (VME) rates of 70.4%, 88.4%, 4.1%, and 32.1%, respectively. No species of EOTEC tested with acceptable rates for all of EA (≥90%), CA (≥90%), ME (≤3%), and VME (≤3%). Etest MICs for Enterococcus faecalis, interpreted using CLSI oral/urine criteria (M100, 2021) showed EA, CA, minor error, ME, and VME rates of 98.5%, 81.2%, 18.8%, 0%, and 0%. Against Staphylococcus aureus, EA, CA, and ME rates were 84.1%, 98.7%, and 1.3% (EUCAST intravenous criteria). S. aureus isolates with fosfomycin MICs of >32 µg/ml (resistant) were not identified by agar dilution. We conclude that performing fosfomycin Etest on isolates of S. aureus will reliably identify fosfomycin-susceptible isolates with low, acceptable rates of MEs and VMEs. Testing of urinary isolates of E. faecalis by Etest is associated with an unacceptably high rate of minor errors (18.8%) but low, acceptable rates of MEs and VMEs when results are interpreted using CLSI criteria. Isolates of EOTEC tested by Etest with resulting MICs interpreted by EUCAST criteria were associated with an unacceptably high VME rate (32.1%). In vitro testing of clinical isolates beyond E. coli, E. faecalis, and S. aureus to determine susceptibility to fosfomycin is problematic with current methods and breakpoints.

Whole genome characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae from respiratory and blood cultures collected from Canadian hospitals before and after PCV-13 implementation in Canada: Focus on serotypes 22F and 33F from CANWARD 2007-2018.

The population of pneumococci circulating in Canada is constantly shifting under the pressures of antimicrobial and conjugate vaccine use. A new 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), containing PCV-13 serotypes plus additional serotypes 22F and 33F, is currently undergoing clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to utilize whole genome sequencing to characterize invasive and respiratory Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected from Canadian hospitals pre- (2007-2011) and post-PCV-13 implementation (2012-2018) in Canada, particularly serotypes 22F and 33F. Isolates were obtained from the CANWARD 2007 to 2018 study. Overall, 597 S. pneumoniae isolates were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform: 180 (101 respiratory, 79 blood) isolates of serotype 22F, 74 (41 respiratory, 33 blood) isolates of serotype 33F and 343 isolates randomly selected to broadly encompass pneumococci in Canada. Genomes were clustered using PopPUNK v2.0.2 and assigned to a Global Pneumococcal Sequencing Cluster (GPSC) and MLST sequence type (ST), and visualized using Cytoscape v3.8.0. Acquired resistance genes were identified using ResFinder 2.1, and genes with chromosomal mutations conferring resistance were extracted and compared to standard reference genome R6. PopPUNK clustering suggests that a clone of S. pneumoniae serotype 22F/ST433/GPSC19 demonstrating mefA-mediated macrolide resistance is emerging in Canada post-PCV-13 introduction, collected from both invasive and respiratory sources. Similarly, there is evidence to support a post-PCV-13 shift towards macrolide- and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant serotype 33F/ST100/GPSC3, including a cluster associated with invasive isolates. While some lineages containing vaccine serotypes were predominantly identified pre-PCV-13 implementation (serotype 5/GPSC8, serotype 7F/GPSC15), others (serotype 19A/GPSC1 and 4, serotype 3/GPSC12) continue to maintain a significant presence over time despite inclusion in PCV-13. Further genomic surveillance is necessary to determine additional trends over time in these upcoming vaccine serotypes, as well as the overall pneumococcal population in Canada.

ESBL-positive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from across Canada: CANWARD surveillance study, 2007-18.

OBJECTIVES: ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are pathogens of increasing importance in Canada and elsewhere in the world. The purpose of this study was to phenotypically and molecularly characterize ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae clinical isolates obtained from patients attending Canadian hospitals over a 12 year period. METHODS: Isolates were collected between January 2007 and December 2018 as part of an ongoing national surveillance study (CANWARD). ESBL production was confirmed using the CLSI (M100) phenotypic method. Susceptibility testing was carried out using custom broth microdilution panels, and all isolates underwent WGS. RESULTS: In total, 671 E. coli and 141 K. pneumoniae were confirmed to be ESBL producers. The annual proportion of ESBL-producing isolates increased for both E. coli (from 3.3% in 2007 to 11.2% in 2018; P < 0.0001) and K. pneumoniae (from 1.3% in 2007 to 9.3% in 2018; P < 0.0001). The most frequent STs were ST131 for E. coli [62.4% (419/671) of isolates] and ST11 [7.8% (11/141)] and ST147 [7.8% (11/141)] for K. pneumoniae. Overall, 97.2% of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates were MDR. blaCTX-M-15 predominated in both ESBL-producing E. coli (62.3% of isolates) and ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (48.9% of isolates). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of ESBL-producing E. coli, especially ST131, and K. pneumoniae, especially ST11 and ST147, in Canada increased significantly from 2007 to 2018. Continued prospective surveillance of these evolving MDR and at times XDR pathogens is imperative.

Comparison of phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing results and WGS-derived genotypic resistance profiles for a cohort of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli collected from Canadian hospitals: CANWARD 2007-18.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the genotypic resistance profile inferred from WGS could accurately predict phenotypic resistance for ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolated from patient samples in Canadian hospital laboratories. METHODS: As part of the ongoing CANWARD study, 671 E. coli were collected and phenotypically confirmed as ESBL producers using CLSI M100 disc testing criteria. Isolates were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform, resulting in 636 high-quality genomes for comparison. Using a rules-based approach, the genotypic resistance profile was compared with the phenotypic resistance interpretation generated using the CLSI broth microdilution method for ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. RESULTS: The most common genes associated with non-susceptibility to ceftriaxone, gentamicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were CTX-M-15 (n = 391), aac(3)-IIa + aac(6')-Ib-cr (n = 121) and dfrA17 + sul1 (n = 169), respectively. Ciprofloxacin non-susceptibility was most commonly attributed to alterations in both gyrA (S83L + D87N) and parC (S80I + E84V), with (n = 187) or without (n = 197) aac(6')-Ib-cr. Categorical agreement (susceptible or non-susceptible) between actual and predicted phenotype was 95.6%, 98.9%, 97.6% and 88.8% for ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Only ciprofloxacin results (susceptible or non-susceptible) were predicted with major error (ME) and very major error (VME) rates of <3%: ciprofloxacin (ME, 1.5%; VME, 1.1%); gentamicin (ME, 0.8%-31.7%; VME, 4.8%); ceftriaxone (ME, 81.8%; VME, 3.0%); and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (ME, 0.9%-23.0%; VME, 5.2%-8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our rules-based approach for predicting a resistance phenotype from WGS performed well for ciprofloxacin, with categorical agreement of 98.9%, an ME rate of 1.5% and a VME rate of 1.1%. Although high categorical agreements were also obtained for gentamicin, ceftriaxone and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ME and/or VME rates were ≥3%.

Invasive pneumococcal disease caused by serotypes 22F and 33F in Canada: the SAVE study 2011-2018.

A 15-valent conjugate vaccine that provides protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes 22F and 33F is in development. Here we report on the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and clonal structure of these serotypes in Canada. From 2011 to 2018, the SAVE study collected 11,044 invasive S. pneumoniae isolates. Of these, 9.3% (1024/11,044) and 3.8% (416/11,044) were 22F and 33F, respectively. Serotype 22F isolates were susceptible to most antimicrobials tested except clarithromycin, where susceptibility significantly decreased over time (2011: 80.4%, 2018: 52.9%, P < 0.0001). Only 1.6% of serotype 22F isolates were multidrug-resistant (MDR), while 96% of typed strains were clonal cluster (CC) 433. Serotype 33F isolates demonstrated low susceptibility to clarithromycin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (22.4% and 24.6%, respectively) and 4.8% MDR. Most serotype 33F isolates were CC100, CC673 and CC717. CC100 prevalence increased significantly over time (2011: 50.0%, 2018: 84.8%, P < 0.006). Continued surveillance of these serotypes is crucial to identify further changes in prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and clonal spread.

Comparison of PCV-10 and PCV-13 vaccine coverage for invasive pneumococcal isolates obtained across Canadian geographic regions, SAVE 2011 to 2017.

To assess the coverage of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae by pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV)-10 and PCV-13 across Canada. In total, 9166 invasive S. pneumoniae isolates were collected as part of the SAVE 2011 to 2017 study. Serotyping was performed by the Quellung reaction and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI methods. The proportion of both PCV-10 and PCV-13 serotypes decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) from 2011 (26.7% and 48.0%, respectively) to 2017 (11.2% and 26.2%). For central, western, and eastern regions of Canada, PCV-13 provided significantly greater (P < 0.0001) coverage at 33.7% (2060/6110), 23.0% (456/1985), and 36.3% (389/1071), respectively, compared to PCV-10 at 15.4% (939/6110), 10.1% (201/1985), and 15.8% (169/1071) coverage. PCV-13 provided significantly greater coverage (53.3%, 282/529) of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates (resistant to ≥3 antimicrobial classes) than PCV-10 (14.6%, 77/529, P < 0.0001). PCV-13 provided significantly greater coverage of invasive S. pneumoniae serotypes, as well as coverage of MDR isolates, than PCV-10.

In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol, a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin, against Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated from Patients in Canadian Intensive Care Units.

The in vitro activity of cefiderocol was evaluated against Gram-negative bacilli isolated from patients in Canadian intensive care units from 2015 to 2017 using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method and interpretive criteria. All 800 isolates of Gram-negative bacilli tested were susceptible to cefiderocol (MIC ≤4 µg/ml), including isolates of ESBL-producing (n=40), AmpC-producing (n=6), and carbapenem-nonsusceptible (n=21) Enterobacterales, carbapenem-nonsusceptible (n=54) and multidrug-resistant (n=29) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n=66), and Acinetobacter baumannii (n=11).

42936 pathogens from Canadian hospitals: 10 years of results (2007-16) from the CANWARD surveillance study.

OBJECTIVES: The CANWARD surveillance study was established in 2007 to annually assess the in vitro susceptibilities of a variety of antimicrobial agents against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients receiving care in Canadian hospitals. METHODS: 42 936 pathogens were received and CLSI broth microdilution testing was performed on 37 355 bacterial isolates. Limited patient demographic data submitted with each isolate were collated and analysed. RESULTS: Of the isolates tested, 43.5%, 33.1%, 13.2% and 10.2% were from blood, respiratory, urine and wound specimens, respectively; 29.9%, 24.8%, 19.0%, 18.1% and 8.2% of isolates were from patients in medical wards, emergency rooms, ICUs, hospital clinics and surgical wards. Patient demographics associated with the isolates were: 54.6% male/45.4% female; 13.1% patients aged ≤17 years, 44.3% 18-64 years and 42.7% ≥65 years. The three most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (21.2%, both methicillin-susceptible and MRSA), Escherichia coli (19.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.0%). E. coli were most susceptible to meropenem and tigecycline (99.9%), ertapenem and colistin (99.8%), amikacin (99.7%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam and plazomicin (99.6%). Twenty-three percent of S. aureus were MRSA. MRSA were most susceptible to ceftobiprole, linezolid and telavancin (100%), daptomycin (99.9%), vancomycin (99.8%) and tigecycline (99.2%). P. aeruginosa were most susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam (98.3%) and colistin (95.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The CANWARD surveillance study has provided 10 years of reference antimicrobial susceptibility testing data on pathogens commonly causing infections in patients attending Canadian hospitals.

Comparison of antimicrobial resistance patterns in Streptococcus pneumoniae from respiratory and blood cultures in Canadian hospitals from 2007-16.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected from respiratory and blood culture samples in Canada between 2007 and 2016. METHODS: S. pneumoniae strains were obtained from Canadian hospitals as part of the ongoing national surveillance study, CANWARD. Isolates were serotyped using the Quellung method. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI broth microdilution method. MDR and XDR were defined as resistance to three or more and five or more classes of antimicrobials, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 2581 S. pneumoniae isolates collected, 1685 (65.3%) and 896 (34.7%) were obtained from respiratory and blood samples, respectively. Respiratory isolates demonstrated lower rates of antimicrobial susceptibility than blood isolates to penicillin, ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, clindamycin, doxycycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (P ≤ 0.03). From 2007 to 2016, invasive isolates demonstrated trends towards increasing penicillin susceptibility and decreasing clarithromycin susceptibility. MDR was significantly higher in respiratory S. pneumoniae compared with blood (9.1% versus 4.5%, P < 0.0001). Serotypes 11A, 16F, 19F, 23A/B/F, 34, 35B and non-typeable strains were more commonly isolated from respiratory specimens, while 4, 5, 7F, 8, 12F, 14 and 19A were more commonly invasive serotypes. Numerous serotypes, including 3 and 22F, were isolated frequently from both specimen sources. CONCLUSIONS: S. pneumoniae from respiratory samples demonstrated lower antimicrobial susceptibilities and higher MDR in a greater diversity of serotypes than isolates obtained from blood. Many serotypes were associated with one specific specimen source, while others were associated with both; genetic characterization is necessary to elucidate the specific factors influencing the ability of these serotypes to commonly cause both invasive and non-invasive disease.

Trends in antimicrobial resistance over 10 years among key bacterial pathogens from Canadian hospitals: results of the CANWARD study 2007-16.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyse 10 years of longitudinal surveillance data (2007-16) from the CANWARD study and describe emerging trends in antimicrobial resistance for key bacterial pathogens across Canada. METHODS: Longitudinal data from CANWARD study sites that contributed isolates every year from 2007 to 2016 were analysed to identify trends in antimicrobial resistance over time using univariate tests of trend and multivariate regression models to account for the effects of patient demographics. RESULTS: Statistically significant increases occurred in the proportion of Escherichia coli isolates resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, amoxicillin/clavulanate, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin. Similarly, the proportion of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, amoxicillin/clavulanate, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin and carbapenems increased during the study. The proportion of Enterobacter cloacae isolates resistant to ceftazidime and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole increased. The proportion of both ESBL-positive E. coli and K. pneumoniae (including bloodstream isolates) increased significantly between 2007 and 2016. A reduction in the proportion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa that were ciprofloxacin, cefepime, colistin, amikacin and gentamicin resistant and an increase in the proportion of P. aeruginosa isolates non-susceptible to meropenem were observed. The proportion of isolates of Staphylococcus aureus non-susceptible to clarithromycin, clindamycin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole decreased over time while an increase in the proportion of isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae non-susceptible to clarithromycin, clindamycin and doxycycline was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in Enterobacteriaceae resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobials, increases in ESBL-positive E. coli and K. pneumoniae, and the small but significant increase in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae were the most remarkable changes in antimicrobial resistance observed from 2007 to 2016 in Canada.

Cefiderocol: A Siderophore Cephalosporin with Activity Against Carbapenem-Resistant and Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Cefiderocol is an injectable siderophore cephalosporin discovered and being developed by Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Japan. As with other ß-lactam antibiotics, the principal antibacterial/bactericidal activity of cefiderocol occurs by inhibition of Gram-negative bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to penicillin binding proteins; however, it is unique in that it enters the bacterial periplasmic space as a result of its siderophore-like property and has enhanced stability to ß-lactamases. The chemical structure of cefiderocol is similar to both ceftazidime and cefepime, which are third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, respectively, but with high stability to a variety of ß-lactamases, including AmpC and extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs). Cefiderocol has a pyrrolidinium group in the side chain at position 3 like cefepime and a carboxypropanoxyimino group in the side chain at position 7 of the cephem nucleus like ceftazidime. The major difference in the chemical structures of cefiderocol, ceftazidime and cefepime is the presence of a catechol group on the side chain at position 3. Together with the high stability to ß-lactamases, including ESBLs, AmpC and carbapenemases, the microbiological activity of cefiderocol against aerobic Gram-negative bacilli is equal to or superior to that of ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem, and it is active against a variety of Ambler class A, B, C and D ß-lactamases. Cefiderocol is also more potent than both ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem versus Acinetobacter baumannii, including meropenem non-susceptible and multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. Cefiderocol's activity against meropenem-non-susceptible and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacteriales is comparable or superior to ceftazidime-avibactam. Cefiderocol is also more potent than both ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem against all resistance phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The current dosing regimen being used in phase III studies is 2 g administered intravenously every 8 h (q8 h) using a 3-h infusion. The pharmacokinetics of cefiderocol are best described by a three-compartment linear model. The mean plasma half-life (t½) was ~ 2.3 h, protein binding is 58%, and total drug clearance ranged from 4.6-6.0 L/h for both single- and multi-dose infusions and was primarily renally excreted unchanged (61-71%). Cefiderocol is primarily renally excreted unchanged and clearance correlates with creatinine clearance. Dosage adjustment is thus required for both augmented renal clearance and in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment. In vitro and in vivo pharmacodynamic studies have reported that as with other cephalosporins the pharmacodynamic index that best predicts clinical outcome is the percentage of time that free drug concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT > MIC). In vivo efficacy of cefiderocol has been studied in a variety of humanized drug exposure murine and rat models of infection utilizing a variety of MDR and extremely drug resistant strains. Cefiderocol has performed similarly to or has been superior to comparator agents, including ceftazidime and cefepime. A phase II prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial assessed the safety and efficacy of cefiderocol 2000 mg q8 h versus imipenem/cilastatin 1000 mg q8 h, both administered intravenously for 7-14 days over 1 h, in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI, including pyelonephritis) or acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in hospitalized adults. A total of 452 patients were initially enrolled in the study, with 303 in the cefiderocol arm and 149 in the imipenem/cilastatin arm. The primary outcome measure was a composite of clinical cure and microbiological eradication at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit, that is, 7 days after the end of treatment in the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population. Secondary outcome measures included microbiological response per pathogen and per patient at early assessment (EA), end of treatment (EOT), TOC, and follow-up (FUP); clinical response per pathogen and per patient at EA, EOT, TOC, and FUP; plasma, urine and concentrations of cefiderocol; and the number of participants with adverse events. The composite of clinical and microbiological response rates was 72.6% (183/252) for cefiderocol and 54.6% (65/119) for imipenem/cilastatin in the MITT population. Clinical response rates per patient at the TOC visit were 89.7% (226/252) for cefiderocol and 87.4% (104/119) for imipenem/cilastatin in the MITT population. Microbiological eradication rates were 73.0% (184/252) for cefiderocol and 56.3% (67/119) for imipenem/cilastatin in the MITT population. Additionally, two phase III clinical trials are currently being conducted by Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Japan. The two trials are evaluating the efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens and evaluating the efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia or healthcare-associated pneumonia caused by Gram-negative pathogens. Cefiderocol appears to be well tolerated (minor reported adverse effects were gastrointestinal and phlebitis related), with a side effect profile that is comparable to other cephalosporin antimicrobials. Cefiderocol appears to be well positioned to help address the increasing number of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant and MDR Gram-negative bacilli, including ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing strains (including metallo-ß-lactamase producers). A distinguishing feature of cefiderocol is its activity against resistant P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, S. maltophilia and Burkholderia cepacia.